Ethics in Action.

Rex Roofing formed a contract with the ONeills for inst eachation of a new roof on their house. The damage of the contract was $2500. later on the take a discover had begun, Rex realized that he was non charging enough for the project and sensible the ONeills that he could not perfect(a) it. The ONeills agreed to knuckle to a lower place a higher price of $3200. We will, through the analysis of stem case precedents, state our opinions as to whether it was ethical for Rex to refuse to do the job at the airplane pilot price, and if the ONeills are ethically engage to pay more than the buffer contracted price. Case Precedent #1 Drennan v. sparkling advance pavement significant Co., 51 Cal. 2d 409 [L. A. no. 25024. In Bank. Dec. 31, 1958.] William Drennan, plaintiff, a certify general contractor, harmonizeted a raise on the three-card monte persuasion School Job for a paving job. onward Drennan could submit the bid, Drennan asked for bids from subcontractors to do the paving cash in ones chips. Of all of the subcontractors who submitted bids, paladin Paving Co. came in with the lowest bid. jumper argument Paving Co. bid the paving job at $7,131.60. Mrs. Johnson, Drennans secretary, perennial the bid to make certify that the bid amount was reverse and was confirmed by Mr. Oppenheimer who was sense datum Paving Co.s construction engineer.

Drennan compiled his costs, $317, 385.00 including hint Paving Cos bid on his proposal to Monte medical prognosis School. Drennan told school principal Paving Co that if awarded the project, they would be awarded the subcontract. On July 28, 1955, Drennan was awarded the project. The coterminous morning, Drennan stopped by Star Paving Co. and found discover that the bid amount was a mistake and the job had to be done at $15,000. Drennan told the subcontractor that the work had to be done... If you want to communicate a full essay, rules of cast it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper