'Hamlet Philosophy Essay\r'

'Shakespe be’s caper, village, is an Elizabethan tragedy. critical point, a young Prince of Denmark, generates a plight between the unrelenting ambition of revenge and impinge on honorable standards. This is very much a look about revenge, but the reason that it continues to intrigue literary and theatrical audiences for al more or less 400 years, is because of the lowlying philosophic meanings. juncture is more a philosophical play than it is a play about revenge. Throughout the play, Hamlet analyzes the uncertainty that demise brings, questions the final arbiter in opinion and defies order of magnitude’s belief in the great arrange of being.\r\nHamlet is surrounded by death. However, he is the only character that confronts death philosophically. patronage the revenge he is planning, Hamlet considers taking his profess demeanor. He strives to extract revenge upon Claudius, but the more guidance he seeks, the more lost and indecisive he becomes. Haml et seriously questions if life is cost living from his life crisis. This is seen in Hamlet’s well-nigh famous soliloquy, that is said at the nation of Elsinore, before being spied upon by Claudius and Polonius. â€Å"To be, or non to be?\r\nThat is the question: / Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer / The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, / Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, / And, by opposing, end them? To die, to sleep†/ No moreâ€and by a sleep to theorize we end / The heartache and the thousand natural shocks / That fig is heir toâ€â€™tis a consummation/ Devoutly to be wished! To die, to sleep. / To sleep, perchance to dreamâ€ay, there’s the rub, / For in that sleep of death what dreams may come / When we capture shuffled off this mortal coil, / Must give us pause. There’s the respect / That makes calamity of so long life.\r\n/ For who would bear the whips and scorns of cartridge clip, / Th’ opp ressor’s wrong, the purple man’s contumely, / The pangs of despised love, the law’s delay, / The insolence of office, and the spurns /That patient merit of th’ vile takes, / When he himself might his quietus make / With a bare bodkin? Who would fardels bear, / To grunt and sweat under a weary life, / But that the dread of something subsequently death, / The undiscovered country from whose bourn / No traveller re folds, puzzles the leave / And makes us rather bear those ills we founder / Than fly to others that we sack out non of?\r\n/ Thus moral sense does make cowards of us all, / And and so the native chromaticity of resolution / Is sicklied o’er with the pale variant of thought, / And enterprises of great pith and moment / With this regard their currents turn awry, / And lose the name of action. â€Å"(3. 1. 57-89) In this soliloquy, Hamlet speculates if suicide is preferable; but it soon occurs to him that death is not a way out, b ecause it is not possible to know what fate comes after death. Hamlet contemplates that the journey to death may lead to an eternal sleep, but it may not; the next life may in fact be worse that the life we are aware of.\r\nIt is the uncertainty death brings that inhibits people from mop up their lives. Furthermore, Hamlet also questions the final arbiter in judgement. This is seen when Hamlet discovers the treachery of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern’s visit, and reveals his depression . â€Å"Why, then, ’tis no(prenominal) to you: for there is nothing / either good or bad but thinking makes it so: to me it is a prison. â€Å"(2. 2. 249-251) Hamlet is referring to how there is no final arbiter in judgement, but that people with differing morals and ethical motive decide to believe in desired opinions that chalk up to their beliefs.\r\nThis observation that Hamlet makes can be compared to the school of thought of existentialism, which holds that â€Å"The starting point of philosophical thinking essential be the experience of the individual. ” (Existentialism) Hamlet is referring to how there is no definitive truth but only inbred truth, and society’s accepted values will favour one kind of truth, no calculate how flawed it may be. Lastly, Hamlet’s bewitchment with death leads him to draw his own conclusions on the moral beliefs of society.\r\nHamlet challenges the great chain of being; the sacred hierarchal structure of all matter and life on earth. Upon his obsession with death, Hamlet asks Horatio for guidance on his perceived speculations at the cemetery about black lovage the Great. â€Å"No, faith, not a jot. But to follow him on that point with / modesty enough, and likelihood to lead it, as thus: / Alexander died, Alexander was buried, Alexander / returned into clay; the dust is earth; of earth we make / loam: and why of that loam, whereto he was converted, / might they not stop a beer bbl?\r\n/ Imperious Caesar, dead and turn’d to clay, / readiness stop a hole to keep the repeal away: / Oh, that that earth which kept the world in awe, / Should patch a wall to expel the overwinter’s flaw! â€Å"(5. 1. 201-210) Hamlet realizes that death is the undeniable fate of everyman; that the fate of everyman is a journey into dust. remnant eliminates the differences between all people, regardless of how distinguished or insignificant they may be. Hamlet concludes that the great chain of being is false and everything in it, ultimately crumbles into dust, rightful(prenominal) like the bones in the cemetery.\r\nHamlet is more a play about philosophical ideas and speculations, than it is a play about vengeance. There have been an usurious amount of tragedies produced, but Hamlet remains the most produced and analyzed Shakespearean play of all time because of all of the philosophical meanings and interpretations. Hamlet philosophies over death, judgement and the great chain of being. The most prominent philosophical idea in Hamlet is the mysteriousness of death. Interestingly, in Hamlet’s soliloquy â€Å"To be, or not to be:\r\nThat is the question… ” (3. 1.57-89), it is addressed as the question, not a question. This can be interpreted as the most important question a person may ever have to face in life. Indeed, Hamlet is Shakespeare’s philosopher. Perhaps Shakespeare was attempting to philosophically question society’s motives in life, similar to Maslow’s pecking order of needs, a theory of successive human motivation. References â€Å"Existentialism. ” n. d. Wikipedia. 06 declination 2012. <http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Existentialism>. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Toronto: Harcourt Canada Ltd. , n. d.\r\n'