Nuclear Deterrence is the Best Defense Against Nuclear War Essay

thermo atomic Deterrence is the Best Defense Against nuclear WarIn 1945, a great technological innovation was dropped over Japan, the atomic bomb. ever so since the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the existence has faced the threat of atomic attack. In reaction to this, world governments have been forced to find a falsification against thermonuclear attack. one and further(a) solution to the danger of nuclear attack is the use of nuclear bullying. Nuclear deterrence is the possession and launching of nuclear weapons for the sole purpose of defense and retaliation against a nuclear attack from another country. Nuclear deterrence is the best answer to the danger of nuclear war, resulting in world hostage and the prevention of nuclear war. However, some people believe that the possession of nuclear weapons for deterrence is unnecessary, expensive and too risky. International security may be at risk with deterrent nukes waiting to be fired at any moments notice. An accident could create a misfire hurting millions of people. A computer could have an error either launching a rocket or reporting incoming missiles. If an incoming missile were reported, tracking place would be instantly contacted to verify the report. The situation is determined in only one minute and a half (Hartinger). The chance of a nuclear weapon accidentally being fired is very unlikely. At nuclear command centers, there are no buttons to accidentally push or chances of computer errors (Walsh 45). An accident tail assemblynot occur because only a person can sequence a launch. The President is the only man who can founding father a nuclear launch in the United States. After the Presidents decision, there is a complex procedure of authorization codes and key turning to ultimately launch the nuclear weapon ... ...num=2&catid=106&UpFront=true.Nuclear tape drive Frequently Asked Questions. American Nuclear Society. <http//www.ans.org/pi/faq/transport.html.OECD Electricity produc tion, share of nuclear 2000. 21 November 2002. Stockholm School of Economics. <http//www.hhs.se/personal/suzuki/o-English/ee05.html.Table of US Nuclear Warheads. Natural Resources Defense Council. 11/25/02. <http//www.nrdc.org/nuclear/nudb/datab9.asp.Transportation of fatigued Nuclear Fuel. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management. <http//www.rw.doe.gov/progdocs/facts/transfct/transfct.htm.USSTRATCOM overshadow Center. United States Strategic Command. Dec. 18, 2002. <http//www.stratcom.af.mil/factsheetshtml/commandctr.htm.Walsh, Edward A. Nuclear War Will Not sink. Nuclear War Opposing Viewpoints. Greenhaven Press, 1985.